Verizon Idearc SuperMedia Stock Fraud Scam discovered. How bankers and executives pad pockets!

July 30, 2010

Verizon’s Idearc SuperMedia Stock Fraud Exposed

Verizon SuperMedia Stock Scam LogoHere is a link to the Class Action Lawsuit filed against Verizon, JP Morgan etc for SuperMedia/Idearc Stock and Bankruptcy Fraud. Verizon, Idearc’s Executive’s including most of the same Verizon and now current SuperMedia leadership, committed a crime! I was a Verizon employee from 2000 to 2006, then Verizon Yellow Pages became Idearc. It all went downhill from there! Looked at the SEC filings and figured out what Idearc did. They may have gotten away with a perfect crime. I just can’t figure out how a bankruptcy court judge would allow it. But considering the compensation of Idearc’s bankruptcy lawyers in Dallas, and the history with the local federal bankruptcy judge… this looks worse than Bernie Madoff!

How to wipe out shareholders and pad the pockets of bankers, hedgefund managers, and executives 101:

Step 1: Create a public company with two accounts one public and one private.

Step 2: Load all debt to the public account at inception, but report all earnings as one entity, which makes most people believe the debt to asset ratio is okay.

Step 3: Put most of the money into the private account.

Step 4: File for bankruptcy and get rid of the public account.

Step 5: Do it again under a new name.

Very clever, but is it legal? The courts will have to decide. The company had $1.7 billion in assets when it filed for chapter 11 and that money was never factored in during the bankruptcy. On at least 3 separate occassions, Verizon has sold or spun off companies which they themselves overloaded with VERIZON debt. (Fairpoint Communications, Hawaiian Telecom, and Idearc Media) All 3 of these companies filed for bankruptcy resulting in massive losses to anyone who invested their hard earned money trusting the Verizon name. I have always been a strong believer in the “buyer beware” philosophy but Verizon’s hands are certainly NOT clean in all of this. Any individual investor who got caught up in this would be hard pressed to defend Verizon. The entire 2006 earnings is a fraud. Verizon declares $772 million net earnings minus any debt. Verizon then spins off Idearc and takes most of the cash and leaves Idearc with $72 million. Verizon set up two accounts in respect of its whole business: one to hold the cash (the $9 Billion that it borrowed), and one to hold the debt for the borrowing (Spinco). The latter it got rid of, but wrapped up in a pretty package, along about Thanksgiving time, called “Idearc” (vaguely reminiscent of a sort of Noah’s arc of supreme “wisdom”), and garnered with a handsome (though very perishable) dividend. Actually, it was a bomb, expressly timed (in the “tax sharing agreement”) to explode exactly at the two year mark necessary to avoid capital gain tax on the transaction.

Check the most recent income and cash flow statements and you will see that the company is an operating cash cow. But in 2009, I think management wanted the bankruptcy to succeed to get out of paying the debt, so they paid out huge sums to bankruptcy attorneys and for marketing consultants. Now that the bankruptcy is over, management owns shares of new stock and will have an incentive to cut costs and raise the stock price. Paulsen had an obvious incentive to provide a low ball value estimation to get the stock as cheaply as possible.

And then, when it did explode in hands of remote purchasers for value (relying on the Verizon name and integrity), and just as was certainly predictable, Verizon, acting like a total stranger, simply walks away. It might have stopped; it might have looked, and thought of something – thrown a blanket over the victim of its own actions – it could have guaranteed the bonds; taken a preferred issue to pay them off, made a short term loan to help its own telephone book get through the recession – many things…but no. The causal agent of the catastrophe acted just like the driver who hits the pedestrian – 437,000. of them in this case – and just goes on driving down the road….the SEC POLICE nowhere to be seen. It is likely the low point of the American securities system and the New York Stock Exchange. Current participants in this don’t want to tell it. History certainly will.

Just in case you wondered:

Counsel to the Debtors  (Idearc) – Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800 Dallas, TX 75201-2784 T: 214-855-8000 F: 214-855-8200 http://www.fulbright.com

Counsel to Unsecured Creditors – Haynes and Boone, LLP 2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700 Dallas, TX 75219 T: 214-651-5000 F: 214-651-5940 http://www.haynesboone.com

The Debtors’ actual cash balance as of July 31, 2009 was $616 million.

and check this out: http://www.belltelretirees.org/images/stories/docket_29_-_supermedias_motion_to_dismiss_reply_brief.pdf

Latest update: Verizon Sued for Fraud http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-16/verizon-sued-by-idearc-creditors-claiming-2006-spinoff-led-to-bankruptcy.html


SuperMedia Ships Jobs to India….. but Scott Klein Got His Bonus!

January 3, 2010

Have you seen the latest headlines about SuperMedia? (on October 5th 2010, SuperMedia CEO Scott Klein resigned, visit YellowCrooks.com’s forums for more info and participate in the discussion.)

Idearc becomes SuperMedia on Jan. 4 2010, meanwhile the Yellow Pages publisher lays off 150 workers in St. Petersburg Florida.


Idearc Media is now SuperMedia

Still $2.75 Billion in debt!



SuperMedia, the company that publishes the Verizon Yellow Pages, is laying off 150 employees in St. Petersburg and shipping the jobs to India.

Idearc / SuperMedia has been trying to emerge from Chapter 11 bankruptcy and sees the outsourcing and layoffs as a cost-cutting move.

About 245 people work for Idearc at its phone directory business at 10200 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr St. N in the Gateway business district of St. Petersburg.

Idearc said it will keep about 90 people in St. Petersburg as it transfers much of its publishing business to Tata Consultancy Services of Mumbai. Idearc plans to hand out severance packages as employees are dismissed in phases through next December.

“There are no surprises. In November, we told the staff in St. Petersburg what was happening,” company spokesperson Andrew Shane said. Idearc is also slashing jobs at phone book publishing operations in Los Alamitos, Calif., and Everett, Wash.

Based in Dallas, Idearc spun off from Verizon in November 2006. The $3 billion company distributes about 127 million phone books and owns Superpages.com.

The phone book business has been shrinking at accelerating speed. Between 2005 and 2007, the number of Yellow Pages printed shrank by 1 billion to 13.4 billion industrywide. In a plan circulated to creditors, Idearc estimated its printed book revenue would be cut by more than half to $1.6 billion between 2004 and 2013.

Idearc/Verizon Yellow Pages

Print revenue

2004: $3.5 billion

2006: $3.0 billion

2008: $2.7 billion

Projected 2013: $1.6 billion*

Online business:

2006: $230 million

2008: $300 million

Projected 2013: $598 million*

Industrywide classified yellow pages printed:

Down 1 billion to 13.4 billion between 2005 and 2007

* Best-case scenario

Source: SEC and court filings

Kinda funny. Internally Idearc is going to list Paulson & Co. as an investor on the site. Idearc forgets that Paulson picked up its share of Idearc for pennies on the dollar. Meanwhile if you noticed what Google was considering purchasing YELP for, it makes me laugh at the markets evaluation of Idearc. Just in-case you are not familiar with the situation, SuperMedia (formerly Idearc, which was formerly Verizon Information Services, which was formerly Bell Atlantic & GTE Yellow Pages) is emerging from a pre-planned bankruptcy.

Scott Klein, like many crony CEOs and Executives, has “lined his own pockets,”  and has “feathered his own nest” by hiring “cronies.”

It was obvious to me that Scott Klein planned bankruptcy the moment he took over Idearc in June of 2008. What folks from the investment community are unaware of is the example of corporate leadership that he has set since he took over reins as the companies CEO. SuperMedia (still working on getting used to saying the new name) operates on bi-weekly pay cycles. Media consultants and earnings are rolled in periods consisting of two weeks called “Pay Periods.” During the first part of 2009, Scott Klein instructed sales managers not to report losses (decreases and cancellations) for Pay Periods 12 and 13 of 2009 to make sure that “upper management” would get the semi-annual quarterly bonuses. SuperMedia sales reps were instructed by management not to report cancellations or decreases in order to make sure that the crony executive team and mid-level managers qualified for the incentive payouts for the period ending pay period 13. I was very disturbed by these actions as an Idearc media consultant. You see, as a yellow pages publisher, it is easy for SuperMedia/Idearc to manipulate the revenue that it reports to investors. All Idearc executives need to do to meet a bonus period is wait to report losses and cancellations. What was even more unique was that these instructions also included direction from executives on reporting the losses on pay period 15 and not dumping them all in pay period 14 which was what you normally saw while they reported earnings to Ivan Seidenburg at Verizon. I assume the company’s Board of Directors was paying close attention to this potential manipulation.  Now let me state that I specifically recalled this happening on a few occasions while at Verizon. The difference with Scott Klein, it was a directive that was company-wide and only a few months after him taking over. Maybe he was just taking advantage of the “quiet period”? Post bankruptcy, Idearc is no longer going to be financially liable for these actions and ramifications to retirees and investor’s 401k’s, pensions, and stock portfolios.

Did Scott Klein purposely default on the companies credit facility debt to enter into bankruptcy? Considering the amount of cash on hand to make the payments….. YES HE DID! That is one of the reasons the company was sued in January and April of 2009.

I am confident that the personal lawsuit against Klein and his executive team will have a dramatic impact on the future of the organization. Just as Mike Leach is no longer the coach of my beloved Texas Tech Red Raiders for his actions, I am sure that Scott Klein will no longer be the leader of SuperMedia in the near future. If Paulson does not take control of the company and put someone more capable (such as Scott Laver) at the helm of SuperMedia, it will sink faster than a torpedoed ship. It is time for SuperMedia to cease crony executive leadership and “YellowCrook” WallStreet stock manipulation. Time to come clean. Time to become more creative. Time to make a commitment to become “SuperMedia” vs just lip-service. Time to put clients and service above sales and earnings. You build it….. they will come! You get the idea!

From 2004 to 2010 Idearc Media will shrunk from 3.5 billion to approx 2.5 billion. From 2010 to 2013 the company is projected to shrink another billion. Considering the company is doing a poor job of competing in a fragmented local search market and the usage of print directories is expected to drop even further (thanks to a wonderful tool such as the mobile web browser) I would expect to see continued outsourcing and cost cutting measures. The unfortunate thing is the company has many of the tools and people it needs to turn around, but with continued mismanagement from executives who do not fully understand what business owners want in a local ad agency, I foresee continued client churn and lackluster results in competing against other internet marketing offers.  Idearc does not seem to understand that you can not put an axe over a clients head to keep or pay for a poor performing internet product. The axe that the threatened local advertisers with to convince them to keep their placement in the print yellow pages does not work online. SuperMedia’s SMLocal product is, in most situations, a 12 month contract (at least the sales reps push you to sign for 12 months, thereby locking you into the companies costly management fees) and that just does not work for an internet offering. Why 12 months for Internet Advertising that can be changed daily, unlike a printed yellow pages advertisement. The company does not offer the client the ability to own the work and campaigns it creates on Google or Yahoo search engines. If they build your website, you never own it. Ownership is possession even after cancellation. In the event the company fails to fulfill the promises delivered to you by sales representatives, you are still required to pay for management fees, since your sales representative was paid a commission. I call these sales “Monopoly Money.” They look great on paper (considering a $2k/month budget for clicks and $800.00 per month management fee is really only $800.00 per month to report to investors) but horrible after they are reported. Maybe they need to just report sales on the monies  it actually collects from advertisers vs just the ink on the contract. Maybe they ought to pay “Media Consultants” for revenue and service to clients vs ink on the contract? Of course we know that when you are a large organization, with a very large resource of collections attorneys and agencies, it helps to work with ambiguous contract terms and conditions.

Once the company addresses core issues with its product offering,  if resolved, (although the company may potentially give up something financially in the short-term,) they will gain long-term in reputation and reduced client churn.The company needs to get web developers and marketers in the field vs sending web development work to India. You will be amazed at the difference a search engine marketer, a local CMS based website developer, and client can produce together vs a “Indian” (are folks from India called Indians?) website developer. After all, website companies that have margins like print yellow pages companies, are doomed for failure. How can they compete with local boutique web marketing firms? How can they produce the same level of service and attention to detail? Do all businesses need this level of service? I don’t believe so. I just don’t understand why a client would choose something else? The reason churn is high in a fragmented local search market: Clients have options! Unlike the print industry, which is dominated by major players, unless Google puts out a simplified internet offering, people will continue to see fragmentation in local search. Kind of like the fragmentation the yellow pages industry has experienced since the decline of print (thanks to the  increased amount of competition in the space.)

You piss off your client = You lose your clients investment for future years. You lose a client, you run out of options to replace them.

Over the years, Idearc executives discovered new options to replace the clients it lost as Verizon by recently changing the company’s credit policies. If folks owed money to Verizon Information Services, after a certain period of time, the balance was forgiven by Idearc. This was, what I consider, blatant attempt at earnings reporting and manipulation. Why would you give someone who has never paid you a dime for advertising a second chance? Oh, I know! You want more monopoly money on the books to get your bonuses! Those contracts that your sales reps bring back in the office, you know… the ones your talk about in meetings and management conference calls, do not mean anything to investors like Paulson & Co. They do not mean anything to clients. They are only important to commissioned sales reps and crony executives and managers looking for fat bonuses…..reminds you of other Yellow Crooks huh? Like the folks at WallStreet Banks and Countrywide Mortgage/Enron Executives?

Let’s see how long this kind of leadership continues?!

Let’s see if someone investigates what happened in Pay Period 13, 14 and 15 of 2009, or if the company’s executive and mid-level managerial leadership gets away with another form of corporate fraud.

Maybe SuperMedia needs to consider firing sales reps who get paid to produce “Executive Bonus Monopoly Money” and begin hiring Search Engine Marketers who can service clients local search marketing needs, you know, since the internet is the wave of the future and all?

Here is to Idearc…. errrrr, I mean SuperMedia and Scott Klein…..

May 2010 be a great year. The lives, careers, and financial freedom of thousands of Media Consultants is on your shoulders. May you make choices and decisions that positively impact your clients, employees, and investors. Let’s end the old tricks of the yellow pages industry.

Happy New Year!

too bad 7 out of 10 people prefer not to get another phone book and the phone book companies don’t care. Meanwhile we must dispose of the waste ourselves. OPT IN vs OPT OUT!

Here is the Scott Klein Lawsuit:

Scott Klein Lawsuit for Securities Fraud SEC